Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper presents a result of research about the student’s radical intention related to their tolerance and personality type. This research was a collaboration between Statistics, Psychology, and Politics. The main research variable that is radical intention has a psychological construct that is theoretically built with a social approach and political point of view. As a big country, Indonesia has various pluralism i.e ethnic and religion, so that it requires a high tolerance attitude to live in a harmony. Students as the next generation and important elements in society are expected to avoid intolerance. The research subjects were 175 students from an Islamic university in Indonesia. The data were analyzed with Ordinal Regression which intention of radicalism (ordinal) as the dependent variable, personality type (nominal), and tolerance attitude level (ordinal) as independent variables. The majority of these students have good moral values so they can tolerate the difference. From the regression analysis, the type personality and tolerance attitude have a significant effect on radicalism intention.

Keywords

Ordinal Regression Pluralism Radicalism-Intention; Tolerance Type of Personality

Article Details

How to Cite
Meiza, A. (2023). The Ordinal Regression to Analyze Radical Intention of Muslim Indonesian Students through Personality Type and Tolerance Approach. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 19(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v19i2.3932

References

  1. Arfan, M. & Sherwani, R.A.K. (2017). Ordinal Logit and Multilevel Ordinal Logit Models: An Application on Wealth Index MICS-Survey Data. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, Vol.13, No.1, 2017, pp 211-226
  2. Ahmad, A. and Nurhidaya. (2020). Media Sosial dan Tantangan Masa Depan Generasi Milenial. Avant Garde: Jurnal
  3. Agresti, A. (2002). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. 2nd edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015). Mengulik Data Suku di Indonesia
  5. Bennett, J.M. (1993). Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. In R. M.
  6. Paige (Ed.). Education for the Intercultural Experience Education. Yarmouth ME: Intercultural Press
  7. Dewi, A.P. (2017). Polri: Intoleransi cikal bakal radikalisme. Antara News
  8. Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  9. Kleinbaum, D.G. & Klein, M. (2010). Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text. Springer Nature
  10. Maskaliunate, A. (2002). Defining terrorism in the political and academic discourse. Baltic Defense Review, 8(2), 405-420
  11. Milla, N.M. and Faturochman. (2009). Pembentukan Identitas Mujahid Global Pada Terpidana Kasus Terorisme DiIndonesia. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, Vol.VI, No.2, 8696. ISSN 0853 9098
  12. Pervin, L.A., Daniel, C., and John, O.P. (2004). Psikologi Kepribadian: Teori dan Penelitian. 9th Edition. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group
  13. D. A. (2010). Uji validitas alat ukur Big Five Personality (adaptasi dari IPIP) pada mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta (Skripsi). Fakultas Psikologi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2010.
  14. Sarwono, S.W. (1999). Psikologi Sosial: Individu dan Teori-teori Psikologi Sosial Jakarta: Balai Pustaka,
  15. Silber, M.D. and Bhatt, A. (2007). Radicalization in The West: The Homegrown Threat. NYPD Intelligence Division
  16. Siqueira, Cardoso, Caiaffa, Abreu & Natali. (2008). Ordinal logistis regression models: application in quality of life studies. PubMed Advanced. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008001600010
  17. The Wahid Institute. (2014). Annual Report on Religious Freedom and Intolerance, Jakarta
  18. Van der Walt, L.J. (2016). Religious tolerance and intolerance: ‘Engravings’ on the soul. In Die Skriflig. 50(1)