Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 788 Download : 595

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Main Article Content

Abstract

This  paper presents Non-Preemptive  priority fuzzy queuing model with asymmetrical service rates. Arrival rate and  service rate are taken to be hexagonal, heptagonal, and octagonal fuzzy numbers. Here an interpretation  is given to determine the performance measures by applying a new  ranking technique through which the fuzzy values are reduced to the crisp values. This ranking technique has the benefit of being precise and relevant compared to other methods such as alpha-cut method and LR method. The main intention is to evaluate the fuzziness before the performance measures are processed by utilizing the regular queueing hypothesis. Three numerical examples are exhibited to show the validity implementation of the methodology.

Keywords

Ranking technique octagonal fuzzy number heptagonal fuzzy number hexagonal fuzzy number Priority queuing model

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following License

CC BY: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.

 

How to Cite
Karupothu, U. P., Richard Wurmbrand, & R P S Jayakar. (2021). An Interpretation of Non-Preemptive Priority Fuzzy Queuing Model with Asymmetrical Service Rates . Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 17(4), 791-797. https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v17i4.3878
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Yeo, G.F. (1963). Preemptive priority queues. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 3, 491-502.
  2. Chang, W.(1965). Pre-emptive Priority Queues. Operations Research, 13, 1020-1022 .
  3. Miller, D.R.(1981). Computation of steady-state probabilities for M/M/1 priority queues. Operations Research, 29, 945-948 .
  4. Brandt. and Brandt, M.(2004).On the two-class M/M/1 system under pre-emptive resume and impatience of the prioritized customers. Queueing Systems, 47, 147-168.
  5. Kalpana, B., & Anusheela, N. (2018). Analysis of a Single Server Non-Pre-emptive Fuzzy Priority Queue using LR Method. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(23), 9306-9310.
  6. Ramli, N., & Mohamad, D. (2009). A comparative analysis of centroid methods in ranking fuzzy numbers. European Journal of Scientific Research, 28(3), 492-501.
  7. Ritha, W., & Robert, L. (2010). Fuzzy queues with priority discipline. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 4(12), 575-582.
  8. Ramesh, R., & Ghuru, S.K. (2014). Priority disciplined queuing models with fuzzy. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(3).
  9. Kalpana, NA.B.(2019).Analysis of Fuzzy Priority Queue with two classes of customers and unequal service rates using Mixed Integer Non-Linear Programming Approach. Journal Engineering and Applied Sciences 14(15), 5030-5038.
  10. McMillan, D.(1995). Delay analysis of a cellular mobile priority queueing system. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 3, 310-319.
  11. Choi, B.D., and Chang, Y.(1999).Single server retrial queues with priority calls. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 30, 7-32 .
  12. Ng, C-H., and Soong, B-H. (2008).Queueing Modelling Fundamentals: With Applications in Communication Networks. John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Jaiswal, N.K. (1968). Priority queues. Academic Press.
  14. Aria, M. (2019). New Fuzzy Logic System for Controlling Multiple Traffic Intersections with Dynamic Phase Selection and Pedestrian Crossing Signal. Journal of Engineering. Science and Technology (JESTEC), 14(4), 1974 - 1983.
  15. Wagner, C., and Hagras, H. (2010). Uncertainty and type-2 fuzzy sets and systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 10th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI). Colchester. United Kingdom, 1-5.
  16. Hajipour, V., Khodakarami, V., and Tavana, M. (2014). The redundancy queuing-location-allocation problem: a novel approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(3), 534-544.
  17. Yager, R.R. (1981). A Procedure for Ordering Fuzzy Subsets of the Unit Interval. Information Science, 24(2), 143-161.
  18. Mueen, Z., Ramli, R.,& Zabidi, NZ. (2017). Analysis of performance measures with single channel fuzzy queues under two class by ranking method. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(1-2), 109-112.
  19. Selvakumaria, K., and Revathi, S.(2021). Analysis of Fuzzy Non-pre-emptive Priority Queuing Model with Unequal Service Rate. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1457-1460.
  20. Li, R.J., and Lee, E.S, (1989). Analysis of fuzzy queues. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 17(7), 1143-1147.
  21. Negi.D.S., and Lee. E. S. (1992). Analysis and Simulation of Fuzzy Queue,. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, .46, 321-330.
  22. Kao, C., Li, C.C., and Chen, S.P. (1999). Parametric Programming to the Analysis of Fuzzy Queue. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 107(1), 93-100.
  23. Chen.S. P. (2005). Parametric Nonlinear Programming Approach to Fuzzy Queues with Bulk Service. European Journal of Operations Research, vol 163, No.2, 434 - 444.
  24. Zadeh, L.A . (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, vol. 8, pp. 338-353.
  25. Zimmermann, H. J. (2011). Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications. (4th , Ed.) New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
  26. Pardo, M.J., and David de la Fuente. (2007). Optimizing a priority discipline queuing model using fuzzy set theory. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 54: 267 281.
  27. Palpandi, B., and Geetharamani, G. (2013). Computing Performance Measures of Fuzzy Non-Preemptive
  28. Priority Queues Using Robust Ranking Technique. Applied Mathematical Analysis, 7(102), 5095-5102.
  29. Devaraj. and Jayalakshmi, D. ( 2012). A Fuzzy Approach to Priority Queues. International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics and System, 2(4),479-488. 28.