Main Article Content

Abstract

The Model assisted estimators are approximately design unbiased, consistent and provides robustness in the case of large sample sizes. The model assisted estimators result in reduction of the design variance if underlying model reasonably defines the regression relationship.  If the model is misspecified, then model assisted estimators might result in an increase of the design variance but remain approximately design unbiased and show robustness against model-misspecification. The well-known model assisted estimators, generalized regression estimators are members of a larger class of calibration estimators. Calibration method generates calibration weights that meet the calibration constraints and have minimum distance from the sampling design weights. By using different distance measures, classical calibration approach generates different calibration estimators but with asymptotically identical properties. The constraint of distance minimization was reduced for studying the properties of calibration estimators by proposing a simple functional form approach. The approach generates calibration weights that prove helpful to control the changes in calibration weights by using different choices of auxiliary variable’s functions.  This paper is an extended work on model assisted approach by using functional form of calibration weights. Some new model assisted estimators are considered to get efficient and stabilized regression weights by introducing a control matrix. The asymptotic un-biasedness of the proposed estimators is verified and the expressions for MSE are derived in three different cases.  A simulation study is done to compare and evaluate the efficiency of the proposed estimators with some existing model assisted estimators.

Keywords

Model assisted estimators calibration approach functional form calibration estimators

Article Details

How to Cite
Alam, N., & Hanif, M. (2021). Some Model Assisted Estimators Using Functional Form Calibration Approach. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 17(4), 963-970. https://doi.org/10.18187/pjsor.v17i4.3667

References

  1. Ben-Michael, Eli & Feller, Avi & Hartman, Erin. (2021). Multilevel calibration weighting for survey data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09052.
  2. Breidt, F. & Opsomer, Jean. (2017). Model-Assisted Survey Estimation with Modern Prediction Techniques. Statistical Science. 32. 190-205. 10.1214/16-STS589.
  3. Deville, J.C. and Särndal, C.E. (1992). Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 87, 376-382.
  4. Eric V. Slud1, 2 (2020). Model-Assisted Estimation of Mixed-Effect Model Parameters in Complex Surveys, Research Report by Center for Statistical Research & Methodology Research and Methodology Directorate U.S. Census Bureau Washington, D.C. 20233
  5. Estevao, V.M. and Särndal, C.E. (2000). A functional form approach to calibration. J. Off. Statist., 16, 379-399.
  6. Estevao, V.M. and Särndal, C.E. (2002). The ten cases of auxiliary information for calibration in two phase sampling. J. Off. Statist., 18, 233-255.
  7. Fuller, W.A. and Isaki, C.T. (1982). Survey design under the regression super population model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,77, 89-96.
  8. Gard, R. (2019). Design-Based And Model-Assisted Estimators Using Machine Learning Methods - Exploring the k-Nearest Neighbor method applied to data from the Recreational Fishing Survey, Master thesis, 15 ECTS Örebro University, School of Business.
  9. Kim, J. K. and Rao, J. N. K. (2012). Combining data from two independent surveys: a model-assisted approach, Biometrika 99: 85-100.
  10. Kumar. S., Sisodia, B.V.S.,Singh,D. and Basak, P. (2017). Calibration approach based estimation of finite population total in survey sampling under super population model when study variable and auxiliary variable are inversely related, Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies; ISSN (Print): 0974-8024, (Online): 2229-5666 Vol. 10, Issue 2, 83-93.
  11. Park,S. and Kim, J.K. (2014). Instrumental-Variable calibration estimation in survey sampling. Statistica Sinica, 24, 1001-1015.