Main Article Content
Abstract
Identifying the most parsimonious model in structural equation modelling is of utmost importance and the appropriate power estimation methods minimize the probabilities of Type I and Type II errors. The power of a test depends on the sample size, Type I error, degrees of freedom and effect size. In this study, a modified approach of using effect size in calculating the non-centrality parameter for power is proposed. This is compared to the approach in Maccallum et al. (1996) at different degrees of freedom and sample size specifications --- taken from 50 to 2000. As the sample size increased the difference between the power of a test for both methods reduced to zero. The results showed that the values for power of a test are the same for the modified and original approaches for large sample sizes and degrees of freedom. The findings also revealed that the sample discrepancy function ($\hat{F}$) is asymptotically unbiased.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following License
CC BY: This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.